creationism

The nation’s universities and the mainstream media may be promoting evolution, but a large percentage of Americans still isn’t buying it.

The wings of a bird, the colors of a butterfly, and the patterns on a seashell defy the theory of Darwinian evolution. Many of us intuit, simply by looking at the splendor that permeates the natural world, that there must be some agent involved other than blind mutations or mere survival-of-the-fittest mechanisms. And now, it seems, some scientists are beginning to accept that intuition, finally admitting that beauty cannot be explained by the theory of evolution, at least as we know it.

A list of scientists who are skeptical about the claims of Darwinism has grown to more than 1,000 signatures.

Physicist Stephen Hawking died in March, but not before working on a final book that provides his answers to a host of major issues – including his disbelief in God.

The Bible says God created the world in six days and on the seventh day he rested. But less than 10 percent of people in the U.K., including those with religious beliefs, now accept the biblical account of Creation.

Answers in Genesis founder Ken Ham is disputing reports the ministry’s Noah’s Ark-themed park is taking on water.

Even secular scientists are beginning to admit the Darwinian assumption of life on other planets may be little more than wishful thinking.

A group of evangelicals is making the case in a new book that one can be serious about Christian faith and still accept a scientific Darwinian account of human origins.

The scientific community needs to get a grip on its bias. Thankfully, the Creator gave them wonderfully-designed hands.

A scientific paper that attributed the design of the human hand to a Creator has been heavily criticized and eventually retracted.