religious freedom

The Supreme Court may take on a case this week about whether artists can be forced to provide services for same-sex weddings.

With all the misinformation out there about the most important religious freedom ruling of the year, here’s a review of the facts.

What I find fascinating about the Court’s ruling is that it aligned very well with the findings of a poll Pat Caddell, formerly a pollster with the Carter Administration, conducted of the American people in August 2015, after the Supreme Court’s decision in favor of same-sex marriage.

Is it ever right to force Americans to violate their deeply held beliefs? Abortion and LGBTQ advocates certainly think so. But history teaches us differently.

Let’s start with with the lesson for culture warriors on the left: Religious objections to state policies have to be handled without prejudice.

Yesterday, the Supreme Court delivered a big victory for the cause of religious freedom and for my favorite cake artist. I’ll unpack the decision.

“The government, consistent with the Constitution’s guarantee of free exercise, cannot impose regulations that are hostile to the religious beliefs of affected citizens and cannot act in a manner that passes judgment upon or presupposes the illegitimacy of religious beliefs and practices.”

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of a Christian baker in Colorado who refused to design a cake for a couple’s same-sex wedding, a controversial case that was widely seen as a standoff between claims of religious liberty and LGBTQ rights.

Christian leaders are voicing their support after the Supreme Court ruled this week in favor of a Colorado baker who refused to bake a wedding cake for a same sex couple.

The U.S. Supreme Court handed religious liberty advocates a major victory Monday when it sided with a Christian baker who refused to design a wedding cake celebrating a same-sex marriage.