The biggest ethical and scientific debate of the early 2000s has all but disappeared. And we need to tell people why.
The biggest ethical and scientific debate of the early 2000s has all but disappeared. And we need to tell people why.
Beloved quadriplegic and disability activist takes the American church to task for trying to eliminate suffering from Christian life.
Might the latest scientific breakthrough end the controversy over embryonic stem cells?
A new breakthrough in embryonic stem cell research? I don't think so. Just more of the same old story.
News that scientists had for the first time recovered stem cells from cloned human embryos prompted dire warnings from religious leaders who say the research crosses a moral red line and could lead to designer babies.
Alleviating suffering isn't a matter of choosing between faith and science. On the contrary, it only happens when the two work hand-in-hand.
The U.S. Supreme Court declined Monday to hear a case about the Obama administration's funding of embryonic stem cell research, thereby allowing the continued use of taxpayer dollars for studies that require the destruction of human embryos.
Scientific research can be pro-life, and the newest Nobel Prize recipient has proved it.
This week, President Obama's executive order expanding federal funding for embryonic stem cell research is in the spotlight.
